Axinn Obtains Summary Judgment Victory Against FDA
October 22, 2012
A team of attorneys from Axinn successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of Watson Laboratories, Inc. in litigation against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The court’s ruling, which is under seal, includes an order that paves the way for the company to bring its generic diabetes drug to market.
The case involved a dispute over the 180-day “first-to-file” marketing exclusivity for generic versions of the multi-billion dollar product Actos® (pioglitazone hydrochloride). FDA had denied exclusivity to Watson in August 2012, instead approving one of Watson’s competitors. In the summary judgment motion, Axinn argued that FDA’s decision should be reversed and that Watson should be entitled to share the marketing exclusivity period.
Today, Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued an order granting Watson Laboratories’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and ordered that the FDA “approve Watson Laboratories' ANDA for generic pioglitazone effective immediately so that Watson may participate in what remains of the shared exclusivity period previously awarded to other generic manufacturers of the drug.”
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SABA North America Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating Compliance: How the 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Updates Are Impacting Businesses
Webinar
Antitrust
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts – Champions of the Arts Awards and Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Cost-Effective and Efficient IP Litigation Strategies – Making Paragraph IV Litigation Work for You
Webinar
Intellectual Property
Hartford HealthCare Black and Red Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Informa CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Axinn Viewpoints
Litigation & Trials