Federal Circuit Rules for Axinn Client in Tamiflu Patent Appeal
April 25, 2014
HARTFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has given Axinn client Natco Pharma Ltd. a second chance at invalidating Gilead Sciences Inc.’s patent on the popular flu drug Tamiflu. The decision could pave the way to Natco’s planned issuance of a generic version of the drug in the United States. Natco was represented by Axinn attorney Thomas Hedemann.
The April 22 Federal Circuit ruling vacated a December 2012 district court ruling that Gilead did not unlawfully extend a patent covering Tamiflu and remanded the issue of the patent’s validity back to the district court for reconsideration.
This is the first time the Federal Circuit has addressed whether a commonly-owned patent that issues after—but expires before—another patent can be rendered invalid for double-patenting. By ruling that it can, the court reaffirmed the double patenting doctrine, which prohibits inventors from unreasonably extending patent protection past the statutory limit.
The ruling also establishes a bright-line rule for patent practitioners and continues to provide inventors like Natco Pharma with the ability to use terminal disclaimers to overcome obviousness-type double patenting rejections.
In March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) granted Natco tentative approval to sell its generic version of Tamiflu in the U.S. market. The approval, however, is contingent upon Natco successfully resolving its patent dispute with Gilead Sciences.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SABA North America Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating Compliance: How the 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Updates Are Impacting Businesses
Webinar
Antitrust
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts – Champions of the Arts Awards and Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Cost-Effective and Efficient IP Litigation Strategies – Making Paragraph IV Litigation Work for You
Webinar
Intellectual Property
Hartford HealthCare Black and Red Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Informa CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Axinn Viewpoints
Litigation & Trials