Judge Gilstrap: For Implementers of SEPs, the Penitent Will Pass
February 15, 2024, 1:52 PM
By: Brian P. Johnson
According to Judge Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas, obligations to negotiate under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms apply not only to standard essential patent (SEP) holders but to implementers of those standards as well. If an implementer does not act in good faith, then the SEP-holder's obligations to do so might even be suspended, according to a recent opinion.
In the past few years, multiple jurisdictions outside the United States have found that implementers not only have an obligation to negotiate in good faith, but when implementers fail to do so, they may waive their FRAND defenses. For instance, in certain European countries, a SEP holder might be able to seek royalties that are not reasonable when faced with a bad-faith implementer. Yet, in the United States, this law is still in development. Opinions on FRAND obligations have grown rare because since the Federal Circuit's decision in TCL v. Ericsson, juries are generally empowered to determine the fate of FRAND defenses, rather than judges. So, the question remained: Do SEP implementers need to negotiate in good faith?
According to a January 22, 2024 decision in G+ Communications v. Samsung Electronics, the answer is yes. At least, eventually. Judge Gilstrap found that a SEP-holder's FRAND obligations are irrevocable but may be suspended when an implementer is acting in bad faith. But that suspension is only temporary. According to the opinion, “[i]f the bad faith actor ceases its bad faith and begins acting in good faith, the good faith negotiations must also resume.” However, if that bad faith actor does not change its ways, then it might be liable for damages in excess of a FRAND royalty rate, including “attorney's fees and the cost of litigation.” A penitent company, therefore, may still reach the holy grail of a FRAND license.
It is both practical and logical that the obligations of a party acting in good faith be suspended when a counterparty to a negotiation for a FRAND license is acting in bad faith.

To subscribe to our publications, click here.
News & Insights
News & Insights
CCWC 21st Annual Career Strategies Conference
Speaking Engagement
SCCE 23rd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
HNBA/VIA Annual Convention 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Key Appellate Decisions Shaping Antitrust Strategy
Webinar
Antitrust
ACI 12th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
National LGBTQ+ Bar Association Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair 2025
Sponsorship
National Bar Association 100th Annual Convention and Exhibits
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Attorneys Named to the 2025 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation Guide
Awards & Recognitions
Keeping Pace: Updates in Cartel Enforcement
Webinar
Antitrust
Hanging in the Balance: Supreme Court Declines to Decide the Uninjured Class Member Question in Labcorp v. Davis
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust