Judge Gilstrap: For Implementers of SEPs, the Penitent Will Pass
February 15, 2024, 1:52 PM
By: Brian P. Johnson
According to Judge Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas, obligations to negotiate under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms apply not only to standard essential patent (SEP) holders but to implementers of those standards as well. If an implementer does not act in good faith, then the SEP-holder's obligations to do so might even be suspended, according to a recent opinion.
In the past few years, multiple jurisdictions outside the United States have found that implementers not only have an obligation to negotiate in good faith, but when implementers fail to do so, they may waive their FRAND defenses. For instance, in certain European countries, a SEP holder might be able to seek royalties that are not reasonable when faced with a bad-faith implementer. Yet, in the United States, this law is still in development. Opinions on FRAND obligations have grown rare because since the Federal Circuit's decision in TCL v. Ericsson, juries are generally empowered to determine the fate of FRAND defenses, rather than judges. So, the question remained: Do SEP implementers need to negotiate in good faith?
According to a January 22, 2024 decision in G+ Communications v. Samsung Electronics, the answer is yes. At least, eventually. Judge Gilstrap found that a SEP-holder's FRAND obligations are irrevocable but may be suspended when an implementer is acting in bad faith. But that suspension is only temporary. According to the opinion, “[i]f the bad faith actor ceases its bad faith and begins acting in good faith, the good faith negotiations must also resume.” However, if that bad faith actor does not change its ways, then it might be liable for damages in excess of a FRAND royalty rate, including “attorney's fees and the cost of litigation.” A penitent company, therefore, may still reach the holy grail of a FRAND license.
It is both practical and logical that the obligations of a party acting in good faith be suspended when a counterparty to a negotiation for a FRAND license is acting in bad faith.

To subscribe to our publications, click here.
News & Insights
News & Insights
IPWatchdog Sixth Annual Live Conference
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
ABA White Collar Crime Institute 2026
Speaking Engagement
GCR Live Cartels: 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SCCE 14th Annual European Compliance & Ethics Institute
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Noerr Competition Day 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: "New" HSR Form Remains in Effect For Now – Fifth Circuit Temporarily Freezes District Court Order that Vacated the New HSR Rule
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
Consumer Brands CPG Legal Forum 2026
Speaking Engagement
NBA CLS 39th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law Annual Symposium 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Chambers Recognizes Axinn’s Antitrust Practice in 2026 Global Rankings — With New Recognition in Cartel Category
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
