Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Ever since the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), to succeed on a defamation claim, plaintiffs who are also public figures have a constitutional requirement to show that the defendant acted with “actual malice”—i.e., knowledge that the allegedly defamatory statement was false or reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity.
The Approach of Public and Private Enforcers to Data Use in the Financial Services Sector
Axinn attorneys Bradley Justus, Craig Minerva, Denise Plunkett, and Danielle Irvine co-authored “The Approach of Public and Private Enforcers to Data Use in the Financial Services Sector,” a chapter in the second edition of the Global Competition Review publication, Data & Antitrust Guide.
FTC Peeling Back the Layers of the Orange Book
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is continuing to pursue pharmaceutical manufacturers for allegedly improperly listing patents in the “Orange Book,” delaying the entry of generic drug competitors.
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Ever since the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), to succeed on a defamation claim, plaintiffs who are also public figures have a constitutional requirement to show that the defendant acted with “actual malice”—i.e., knowledge that the allegedly defamatory statement was false or reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity.
The Approach of Public and Private Enforcers to Data Use in the Financial Services Sector
Axinn attorneys Bradley Justus, Craig Minerva, Denise Plunkett, and Danielle Irvine co-authored “The Approach of Public and Private Enforcers to Data Use in the Financial Services Sector,” a chapter in the second edition of the Global Competition Review publication, Data & Antitrust Guide.
FTC Peeling Back the Layers of the Orange Book
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is continuing to pursue pharmaceutical manufacturers for allegedly improperly listing patents in the “Orange Book,” delaying the entry of generic drug competitors.
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Ever since the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), to succeed on a defamation claim, plaintiffs who are also public figures have a constitutional requirement to show that the defendant acted with “actual malice”—i.e., knowledge that the allegedly defamatory statement was false or reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity.
Insights
