Axinn’s Client Awarded Attorneys’ Fees in “Exceptional” PIV Case
March 28, 2019
In Axinn’s latest victory for its client Alvogen, a Delaware federal district court granted in part Alvogen’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Alvogen’s generic version of the medication Uceris® had been accused of infringing a patent owned by Cosmo Technologies Ltd. At trial, Alvogen prevailed on its motion for a judgment of noninfringement under Rule 52(c) made at the close of Plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, which was “a truly rare occurrence (and nearly-unprecedented for the undersigned Judge).” The Federal Circuit summarily affirmed the district court’s decision on January 14, 2019. On March 27, 2019, the district court found this case was “exceptional” under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarded Alvogen its attorneys’ fees incurred after the pretrial conference. The district court based its decision on “the substantive weakness of Plaintiffs’ claims of infringement” and Plaintiffs’ “unreasonable” and prejudicial litigation conduct, including their “last-minute without-warning decision” to drop two other patents just two business days before trial. The Axinn team included Matt Becker and Jason Murata.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SABA North America Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating Compliance: How the 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Updates Are Impacting Businesses
Webinar
Antitrust
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts – Champions of the Arts Awards and Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Cost-Effective and Efficient IP Litigation Strategies – Making Paragraph IV Litigation Work for You
Webinar
Intellectual Property
Hartford HealthCare Black and Red Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Informa CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Axinn Viewpoints
Litigation & Trials