Axinn Antitrust Insight: HSR Overhaul: Out with the New, In with the Old
March 20, 2026, 10:41 AM
After more than a year in effect, the FTC’s burdensome new rule for HSR filings has been suspended. Effective immediately, parties to HSR-reportable deals may comply with the HSR Act by preparing filings under the FTC’s former, less onerous rule.
On February 12, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas struck down the FTC’s 2025 expansion of the regulatory requirements for HSR filings. But since February 12, the district court’s order has been temporarily stayed to allow the FTC to appeal the district court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Yesterday (March 19, 2026), the Fifth Circuit denied the FTC’s motion to stay pending appeal, causing the district court’s order vacating the new rule to finally take effect.
Immediately following the ruling, the FTC’s Premerger Notification Office announced that the “Commission is now accepting HSR filings using the Form and Instructions that were in place before the February 10, 2025, effective date of the new rule.” The FTC also noted that it will “continue to accept HSR filings made pursuant to the February 10, 2025, Form and Instructions should filers voluntarily decide to submit them.”
With the return to the old form, filing an HSR will be substantially less burdensome. Parties will no longer be required to provide (1) narrative descriptions and customer information for horizontal overlaps and vertical supply relationships; (2) transaction rationale for the deal; (3) ordinary course documents about competition; or (4) transaction-related documents from a “supervisory deal team lead.” Additionally, buyers will not need to provide information about overlapping officers or directors or non-transaction-related agreements between the parties.
The FTC’s openness to “voluntary” use of the longer form bears watching in practice, including whether FTC staff might suggest to filers that the longer submission be made “voluntarily” in order to stave off a more in-depth investigation (either a preliminary investigation involving a voluntary access letter, which would ask for much of the information that the "new" form required, or a Second Request).
Although the FTC has lost its motion for a stay pending appeal, it may still continue to pursue its appeal on the merits before the Fifth Circuit (and ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court). While businesses have been granted a reprieve from the new HSR rule for the time being, the new rule is only “mostly dead” – winding litigation through the appellate process will determine whether it is revived.

To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Tags
News & Insights
News & Insights
30th Annual IBA Competition Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Axinn Represents Modular in $4 Billion Acquisition by Qualcomm
Deals & Cases
Antitrust
Will New DOJ Timing Agreement Deliver Faster Merger Clearances?
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
Why U.S. Regulators Are Cracking Down on Private Equity Investments in the Healthcare Sector
Byline Articles
Antitrust
Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law
Speaking Engagement
Litigation & Trials
American Bar Association: Inside Antitrust Enforcement—Former Government Perspectives
Webinar
Antitrust
What's the Skinny on SCOTUS' Skinny Label Decision?
Webinar
Intellectual Property
National Bar Association Corporate Counsel Leadership Summit
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
FTC Prescribes Lower Out-of-Pocket Insulin Costs in Settlement with Caremark
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
The FTC’s Record $12 Million HSR Penalty: Deal Structuring, Avoidance, and the Line Between Them
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust