Axinn IP Update: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
March 18, 2019
By: Thomas K. Hedemann
Axinn Update
Today the Supreme Court took the relatively uncommon step of calling for the views of the solicitor general as to the petition for certiorari in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Docket No. 18-817. Whereas the Court grants certiorari to only about one percent of petitions generally, it grants around one third of the petitions for which it has called for the views of the solicitor general. If the Court grants certiorari here, it will address the question “[w]hether patents that claim a method of medically treating a patient automatically satisfy Section 101 of the Patent Act, even if they apply a natural law using only routine and conventional steps.” The petition was an appeal from a decision by a split Federal Circuit panel that a method for treating a patient with schizophrenia, which involved analyzing the patient’s DNA and adjusting the dosage of a drug accordingly, was patent eligible because it was not directed to a law of nature under step one of the Mayo/Alice two-step subject matter eligibility test. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited, 887 F.3d 1117, 1133-36 (Fed. Cir. 2018). Any decision could have a significant impact on patents directed to methods of treatment in the pharmaceutical and biologics industries.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SABA North America Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating Compliance: How the 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Updates Are Impacting Businesses
Webinar
Antitrust
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts – Champions of the Arts Awards and Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Cost-Effective and Efficient IP Litigation Strategies – Making Paragraph IV Litigation Work for You
Webinar
Intellectual Property
Hartford HealthCare Black and Red Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Informa CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Axinn Viewpoints
Litigation & Trials