Axinn Defeats TRO, Enabling Immediate Launch of Generic Versions of AstraZeneca’s Blockbuster Crestor
July 20, 2016
A team of attorneys from Axinn intervened on behalf of Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Apotex Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to oppose AstraZeneca’s motion for a temporary restraining order. Attorneys from several firms intervened on behalf of five other generic pharmaceutical companies as well. AstraZeneca sought the order to block the FDA from approving generic versions of its top-selling cholesterol drug, Crestor (the fifth largest blockbuster drug on the market). AstraZeneca argued that the FDA cannot approve any generic versions of Crestor because it has so-called orphan drug exclusivity for a rare pediatric use of the drug that would prevent generic competition before 2023.
On July 19, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss held a TRO hearing at which the Axinn team argued on behalf of all of the Intervenor-Defendants. Judge Moss denied AstraZeneca’s motion for a TRO, allowing generic versions of the drug to enter the market.
Last year, Axinn attorneys also defeated a TRO enabling the immediate launch of generic versions of Otsuka's blockbuster Abilify.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
SABA North America Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating Compliance: How the 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Updates Are Impacting Businesses
Webinar
Antitrust
Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts – Champions of the Arts Awards and Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Cost-Effective and Efficient IP Litigation Strategies – Making Paragraph IV Litigation Work for You
Webinar
Intellectual Property
Hartford HealthCare Black and Red Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Informa CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Recent Decision Shows the Heavy Burden of Actual Malice in Defamation Suits
Axinn Viewpoints
Litigation & Trials