Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
National Bar Association 100th Annual Convention and Exhibits
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Keeping Pace: Updates in Cartel Enforcement
Webinar
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Europe 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Navigating the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act in 2025
Webinar
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
State by State, Pre-Merger Notifications Expand
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
FTC claims diverging market from EU in Mars/Kellanova clearance
Media Mentions
Keeping an Eye on the Ball: America First Antitrust Weighs in on the “Uniquely American System of Scholar Athletics”
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
Wait, We Have To Tell Who? What You Need To Know About State Premerger Notifications
Podcast
MBK | MSK Fellowship Summit 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust