Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
Informa 35th Annual Advanced EU London Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Health Care Transactions Program 2026
Sponsorship
Antitrust
IPWatchdog Sixth Annual Live Conference
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Axinn Antitrust Insight: HSR Overhaul: Out with the New, In with the Old
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
The DOJ's Whistleblower Program and Leniency
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
Squires Again Broadens Discretion for Post-Grant Proceedings
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
ABA White Collar Crime Institute 2026
Speaking Engagement
Back to the Well: FDA’s Draft Guidance on New Clinical Investigation Exclusivity
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
Mother, May I? The Use of Prior Approval Requirements in Merger Settlements
Podcast
Antitrust
The Curtain Rises Again on FTC Act Section 5
Axinn Viewpoints