Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
ITCTLA Mock Hearing Program 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
IBA Annual Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
GCR Live: Global Merger Control 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Thomson Reuters 24th Annual Law Firm COO & CFO Forum
Speaking Engagement
LegalNEXT 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Informa Antitrust Texas 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Shifting Trends in Healthcare Antitrust Enforcement: Navigating the Evolving Landscape
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust
ACI Forum on Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation USA 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
MCCA Gala 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
In Fashion, One Day You’re In and the Next Day You’re Out (Of Chances to Plead Violations of the Sherman Act)
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust