Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
The Empty Chair in Antitrust Conspiracy Cases
Webinar
Antitrust
USC Gould/Analysis Group Global Competition Law Thought Leadership Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
17th ACI Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
GCR Live: Europe 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
20th Annual IBA Competition Mid-Year Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Axinn Partners Named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Litigators 2026
News
Litigation & Trials
Turning Up the Heat: Federal Circuit Sets the Temperature for pH Measurements in Precedential Opinion
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
Axinn Represents Tecomet in Closing of Merger with Orchid Orthopedic
Deals & Cases
Antitrust
Recent Benchmarking Suits Highlight DOJ Enforcement Risks
Byline Articles
Antitrust
“Old Crime, New Code” – DOJ Outlines its Views on When Software and AI Can Facilitate Collusion
Axinn Viewpoints
Antitrust