Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
DC Bar: The DOJ's New Antitrust Whistleblower Rewards Program: An Overview and the Road Ahead
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Informa Antitrust Midwest 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
National LGBTQ+ Bar Association Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair 2026
Sponsorship
What’s Up? Enforcement Updates From the Middle East and Africa
Podcast
Antitrust
AHLA Annual Meeting & In-House Counsel Program
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Lexology In-Depth: Intellectual Property and Antitrust (2026)
Byline Articles
Intellectual Property
Tracking The Rare 'Quick Look' Win In FTC's Zillow-Redfin Suit
Byline Articles
Antitrust
Gleiss Lutz Annual Antitrust Law Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
What Top Law Firms Say New Lawyers Need in the AI Era
Media Mentions
What’s the Role of Communications Strategy in M&A? How Public Affairs Impacts Antitrust
Podcast
Antitrust