Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
CCWC 22nd Annual Career Strategies Conference
Sponsorship
Fordham Competition Law Institute's 53rd Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy, and Antitrust Economics Workshop
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Women, Influence, & Power in Law Conference 2026
Sponsorship
Antitrust
IP Litigation North America Summit 2026
Sponsorship
Intellectual Property
HNBA/VIA Annual Convention 2026
Sponsorship
Antitrust
30th Annual IBA Competition Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
ABA 2026 Antitrust Global Seminar Series
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Do I Really Need To File? HSR Avoidance and the Edwards/Genesis Settlement
Podcast
Antitrust
Axinn Attorneys Earn Top Honors in Best Lawyers 2027
News
Antitrust
DOJ's Antitrust Division Remains Interested in Your Private Litigation
Byline Articles
Antitrust