The DOJ’s Whistleblower Program and Leniency
March 19, 2026, 6:36 PM
By: Daniel K. Oakes
The DOJ Antitrust Division's new Whistleblower Rewards Program could have negative unintended consequences for the leniency program and corporate compliance programs. I wrote about it in an article just published in Law360, titled “How Internal Reporting Could Benefit Antitrust Whistleblowing.”
The Whistleblower Rewards Program has caused a stir in the antitrust community and will certainly be the topic of much discussion at the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting next week. It signifies a sea change in how the government approaches criminal antitrust case generation. Where the DOJ formerly relied on its long-running (and massively successful) corporate leniency program, it now looks to incentivize individual employees to race against the company to report directly to the government.
I recently spoke on a panel at GCR Live: Cartels where I raised some potential risks of the program that have not been widely discussed. Namely, because whistleblowers can receive such massive payments in exchange for their reports, they will be heavily incentivized to circumvent internal corporate reporting altogether.
This could damage the very corporate compliance systems that the DOJ has encouraged for years, and limit the ability of companies to detect, investigate, and address antitrust issues internally. This includes the ability to seek corporate leniency, which is often the best way for the DOJ to obtain the fulsome evidence needed to win antitrust conspiracy cases.
I propose that the program be altered to incentivize potential whistleblowers to make internal reports and cooperate with internal investigations first, perhaps by reserving the largest whistleblower rewards for those who do so, comply and assist with corporate investigations, and ultimately yield accompanying leniency applications. This is modeled in other federal whistle-blower programs, such as the CFTC and the SEC programs.
The DOJ would not need to close the door to direct government reporting first, preserving the leniency-like race it wants to engender. But altering incentives could increase the chances that the Whistleblower Rewards Program does not ultimately cannibalize the Leniency Program.
If the whistleblower program inadvertently discourages internal reporting or undermines incentives for companies to seek leniency, it could reduce the government's ability to bring strong criminal cartel cases.

To subscribe to our publications, click here.
News & Insights
News & Insights
Informa Antitrust Midwest 2026
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
National LGBTQ+ Bar Association Lavender Law Conference and Career Fair 2026
Sponsorship
AHLA Annual Meeting & In-House Counsel Program
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Gleiss Lutz Annual Antitrust Law Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
South Asian Bar Association of North America Annual Conference
Sponsorship
Axinn Named Antitrust Law Firm of the Year at the Chambers USA Awards 2026
News
Antitrust
Chambers USA Awards 2026
Sponsorship
Antitrust
ABA 2026 Antitrust International Cartel Workshop
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Axinn Earns Recognition in the Legal 500 2026 U.S. Guide for Antitrust and Litigation
News
Antitrust
Axinn Attorneys Featured in 2026 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation Guide
News
Antitrust
