John Tanski is a skilled courtroom advocate with deep experience litigating antitrust, commercial and intellectual property claims. Leading domestic and international companies rely on John’s sound advice to help them navigate their most consequential business disputes. John has litigated some of the largest and most complex lawsuits in recent years, successfully defending multibillion-dollar individual and class claims in federal and state courts across the country and in multidistrict litigation. Clients praise John's “intellectual firepower” and describe him as “a valuable counselor” for “business clients as they weigh the pros and cons of the possible paths to follow.”
In the antitrust field, John is currently defending Tyson Foods against billion-dollar output reduction and index manipulation claims brought by three classes, more than one hundred individual plaintiffs, and multiple state attorneys general in the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation and related matters. He has also represented international clients in the sprawling In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation cartel case and defeated a nine-figure boycott claim against Stanley Black & Decker on summary judgment.
In commercial litigation, John is lead counsel for Alvogen in the multi-billion-dollar National Prescription Opiate multidistrict litigation and in related proceedings across the country. He has also successfully represented defendants in class actions involving a variety of products, from infant formula to financial products to insurance, and he regularly litigates claims of unfair trade practices, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.
John has a wide-ranging intellectual property litigation practice in which he has fought off claims of patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation and breach of patent license. Early in his Axinn career, John was part of the trial team that successfully defended Actavis against a ten-figure patent damages claim involving the blockbuster drug Neurontin®. More recently, John defeated a multi-billion-dollar lost profits claim against Hubbell in a case alleging the theft of wireless lighting technology trade secrets.
John also maintains an active pro bono practice. The Second and Tenth Circuits have appointed John to represent indigent clients in federal appeals, and he has served as pro bono trial counsel in discrimination matters for the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. In addition, John is the Vice Chairman of the Glastonbury Water Pollution Control Authority and a member of the Connecticut State Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights.
John is recognized in Best Lawyers in America in the areas of commercial litigation and antitrust litigation. He is a member of the Hartford Business Journal’s “40 Under Forty” class of 2019, and he was honored as a “New Leader in the Law” by the Connecticut Law Tribune in 2013. Before entering private practice, John served as a law clerk to the Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
- Connecticut Bar Association, Executive Committee Antitrust and Trade Regulation Section (2021-2022)
- American Bar Association, Section of Litigation
- US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Pro Bono
- Panel (2019 – 2022)
- Represents Tyson Foods in the Broiler Chicken antitrust litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
- Represents Nishikawa Rubber Company in the Auto Parts antitrust MDL in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
- Won dismissal of all claims against Friedrich Boysen GmbH & Co. KG in the Auto Parts antitrust class action MDL in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
- Won unanimous affirmance in the Fourth Circuit of summary judgment defeating a nine-figure antitrust claim alleging that Stanley Black & Decker and other table saw manufacturers engaged in a group boycott of table saw safety technology.
Intellectual Property Litigation
- Won summary judgment of no lost profits for Hubbell erasing a ten-figure trade secret damages claim relating to wireless lighting control systems in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut.
- Won a temporary restraining order preventing Lego from blocking the import of construction toys by Canadian manufacturer Mega Brands in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
- Served on a trial team that obtained a favorable resolution for Actavis of ten-figure patent infringement claims by Pfizer relating to the drug Gabapentin in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Other Complex Commercial Litigation
- Represents a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer in the Opioid litigation In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and in Pennsylvania state court.
- Successfully briefed an appeal on behalf of national insurance broker Brown & Brown, winning unanimous affirmance in the Connecticut Supreme Court of summary judgment on all claims brought by Blumberg Associates Worldwide. He previously briefed and argued the case successfully in the Connecticut Appellate Court.
- Won a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for health care benefit and payment solutions provider WEX Health (formerly Evolution1) requiring benefits administrator Flex-Plan Services, Inc. to continue to perform the parties’ contract after Flex-Plan sued WEX Health seeking early termination.
- Won permission from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to take an interlocutory appeal of an order certifying a class for claims of false advertising against Mead Johnson, the maker of Enfamil LIPIL infant formula. Then persuaded the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer and consolidate similar class actions filed in districts across the country. Then obtained court approval of nationwide settlement of the consolidated claims, and then won unanimous affirmance of the settlement's approval in the Eleventh Circuit.
- The Hartford Business Journal 40 Under Forty Class (2019)
- Best Lawyers (2019 – 2023)
- Super Lawyers (2013 – 2022)
In February of 2018, Axinn was nominated for Global Competition Review "Litigation of the Year – Cartel Defence" for its work on behalf of Nishikawa Rubber Company in the Auto Parts litigation. This award recognizes "creative, strategic and innovative litigation on behalf of a defendant in a private action for cartel damages."
- In February of 2017, Axinn was nominated for Global Competition Review “Litigation of the Year – Non-Cartel Defence” for its work in winning summary judgment for Stanley Black & Decker in a lawsuit alleging that leading table saw manufacturers had conspired to boycott saw safety technology.
- Connecticut Law Tribune – "New Leader in the Law" (2013)
- Axinn Attorneys Named to Best Lawyers 2023
- Axinn Attorneys Named to Best Lawyers 2022
- Axinn Secures Pro Bono Victory in the Second Circuit
- Axinn Attorneys Named to Best Lawyers 2021
- Axinn Partners Named to Best Lawyers 2020
- Axinn Partner John Tanski Named Hartford Business Journal “40 Under Forty” Winner
- Axinn Obtains Substantial Recovery For Pro Bono Client
- Axinn Wins Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Friedrich Boysen GmbH & Co. KG
- Eight Axinn Partners Named to Best Lawyers 2019
- Axinn Wins Unanimous Fourth Circuit Victory for Stanley Black & Decker
- Axinn Obtains Global Settlement of Claims Against Code Rebel
- Axinn Receives GCR Award Nomination for Cartel Representation
- GCR Nominates Axinn for Litigation of the Year, Deal of the Year and Dealmaker of the Year
- Axinn Wins Summary Judgment for Stanley Black & Decker
- Axinn Promotes Rachel Adcox and John Tanski to Partner; Thomas Hedemann to Counsel
- John Tanski Appointed to State Business Commission
- Connecticut Supreme Court Unanimously Affirms Summary Judgment for Axinn Client
- Axinn Wins Preliminary Injunction for WEX Health (formerly known as Evolution1)
- John Tanski Honored as "New Leader in the Law"
- Axinn Wins Another Appeal for Brown & Brown
- View More ›
- The 2020 Axinn Survey of U.S. Litigation Involving Japanese Companies, November 2020
- 6 Lessons on Jury Advocacy in the Wake of a Crisis, Law360, May 11, 2020
- Attorney-Client Privilege in the United States: Recent Trends in its Application to Japanese Patent Professionals, AIPPI Journal, April 2020
- The 2019 Axinn Survey of U.S. Litigation Involving Japanese Companies, March 2020
- Axinn Insights on U.S. Litigation for Japanese Companies: The Duty to Preserve Documents and Implement Litigation Holds in U.S. Civil Litigation, August 19, 2019
- Integrating Trade Secrets into a Comprehensive IP Strategy, Today's General Counsel, June 19, 2018
- 'Extraordinary' $46M BofA Award Upends Punitives Formula, Law360, April 27, 2018
- Recent Developments in Japanese and U.S. Trade Secret Laws, Business Law Journal, No. 104, November 2016
- Trade Secrets Bill Clears House, Obama to Sign Into Law, Bloomberg BNA, April 28, 2016
- Are Your Secrets Safe?, Risk Management, June 1, 2014
- Protecting Business Trade Secrets When Working Abroad, Hartford Business Journal, April 28, 2014
- IP Law: Trade Secrets And Patent Reform, The Connecticut Law Tribune, April 17, 2014
- Drawing the Line Between Descriptive and Suggestive Trademarks, Commercial & Business Litigation, September 15, 2010
- When Hiring and Firing, Don’t Forget the FCRA: Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Cash In When Employers Don’t Know the Rules, Connecticut Lawyer, July 2009
- TARP’s New "Cop on the Beat" Pledges Aggressive Federal Investigations, Fairfield County Business Journal and CBIA News, March 23, 2009
- Heartland Data Security Breach Highlights the Need for Uniformity, Transparency in Consumer Notification Rules, Fairfield County Business Journal, February 23, 2009
- That’s Privileged—Or Is It?, Connecticut Law Tribune, March 2008
- The Law of Departing Employees and Business Partners: Commonly Asserted Tort and Contract Claims, Connecticut Bar Association, November 2007
- Keeping Japanese Companies Out of U.S. Courts
- The Essentials of Federal Practice
- Your Company Has Been Sued in the U.S.: What to Do in the First 10 Days
- Keeping Japanese Companies Out of U.S. Courts: Contesting U.S. Jurisdiction and Dealing with U.S. Subsidiary Litigation
- Japanese Companies in U.S. Litigation
- Hartford Business Journal's 40 Under Forty Awards
- Global Antitrust Practice in the 2020s: Lessons From Europe and the United States, Including Cartel Defense Strategy, Platform Markets, and More
- So You Thought You Settled: A Guide to U.S. Class Actions
- Ethics and Intellectual Property: Traps, Pitfalls, and Adventures in IP Lawyering (2018)
- 2018 CBA Annual Connecticut Legal Conference
- The Federal Circuit Relaxes the Rules on Proving Divided Infringement
- Damages Under State Trade Secret Laws and The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
- Document Management Policies: Reducing Future Litigation Risk & Cost
- Ethics and Intellectual Property Traps, Pitfalls and Adventures in IP Lawyering (2017)
- The Essentials of Depositions
- 2017 CBA Annual Connecticut Legal Conference
- Magna’s Mock Crisis; Part III
- How to Break Your Adversary Without Breaking the Bank: IP Litigation Strategies
- Trading in Secrets: Dealing with Employee and Data Mobility
- JD – Columbia Law School (2006) Managing Editor, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. James Kent Scholar. Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. Simon H. Rifkind Prize. Lawrence S. Greenbaum Prize.
- AB, cum laude – Princeton University (2003)
- New York
- US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- US District Court District of Colorado
- US District Court District of Connecticut
- US District Court Southern District of New York
- US District Court Eastern District of Michigan
- US Supreme Court